Ques:
Given two ASICs. one has setup violation
and the other has hold violation. how can they be made to work together without
modifying the design?
Ans: Slow the clock down on the one with setup violations..
And add redundant logic in the path where you have hold violations.
Ques: Suggest some ways to increase clock frequency?
Ans: Check critical path and optimize it.
· Add more timing constraints (over constrain).
· pipeline the architecture to the max possible extent keeping in mind latency req's.
Ans: Slow the clock down on the one with setup violations..
And add redundant logic in the path where you have hold violations.
Ques: Suggest some ways to increase clock frequency?
Ans: Check critical path and optimize it.
· Add more timing constraints (over constrain).
· pipeline the architecture to the max possible extent keeping in mind latency req's.
Ques:
What are different types of timing verifications?
Ans: Dynamic timing:
a. The design is simulated in full timing mode.
b. Not all possibilities tested as it is dependent on the input test vectors.
c. Simulations in full timing mode are slow and require a lot of memory.
d. Best method to check asynchronous interfaces or interfaces between different timing domains.
Static timing:
a. The delays over all paths are added up.
b. All possibilities, including false paths, verified without the need for test vectors.
c. Much faster than simulations, hours as opposed to days.
d. Not good with asynchronous interfaces or interfaces between different timing domains.
Ans: Dynamic timing:
a. The design is simulated in full timing mode.
b. Not all possibilities tested as it is dependent on the input test vectors.
c. Simulations in full timing mode are slow and require a lot of memory.
d. Best method to check asynchronous interfaces or interfaces between different timing domains.
Static timing:
a. The delays over all paths are added up.
b. All possibilities, including false paths, verified without the need for test vectors.
c. Much faster than simulations, hours as opposed to days.
d. Not good with asynchronous interfaces or interfaces between different timing domains.
Ques : Can you
explain what stuck at zero means?
Ans : These stuck-at problems will appear in ASIC. Some times, the nodes will permanently tie to 1 or 0 because of some fault. To avoid that, we need to provide testability in RTL. If it is permanently 1 it is called stuck-at-1 If it is permanently 0 it is called stuck-at-0.
Ans : These stuck-at problems will appear in ASIC. Some times, the nodes will permanently tie to 1 or 0 because of some fault. To avoid that, we need to provide testability in RTL. If it is permanently 1 it is called stuck-at-1 If it is permanently 0 it is called stuck-at-0.
Ques : What is "Scan" ?
Ans : Scan
Insertion and ATPG helps test ASICs (e.g. chips) during manufacture. If you
know what JTAG boundary scan is, then Scan is the same idea except that it is
done inside the chip instead of on the entire board. Scan tests for defects in
the chip's circuitry after it is manufactured (e.g. Scan does not help you test
whether your Design functions as intended). ASIC designers usually
implement the scan themselves and occurs just after synthesis. ATPG (Automated
Test Pattern Generation) refers to the creation of "Test Vectors"
that the Scan circuitry enables to be introduced into the chip. Here's a brief
summary:
Scan Insertion is done by a tool and results in all (or most) of your design's
flip-flops to be replaced by special "Scan Flip-flops". Scan flops
have additional inputs/outputs that allow them to be configured into a
"chain" (e.g. a big shift register) when the chip is put into a test
mode.
The Scan flip-flops are connected up into a chain (perhaps multiple chains)
The ATPG tool, which knows about the scan chain you've created, generates a
series of test vectors.
The ATPG test vectors include both "Stimulus" and
"Expected" bit patterns. These bit vectors are shifted into the chip
on the scan chains, and the chips reaction to the stimulus is shifted back out
again.
The ATE (Automated Test Equipment) at the chip factory can put the chip into
the scan test mode, and apply the test vectors. If any vectors do not match,
then the chip is defective and it is thrown away.
Scan/ATPG tools will strive to maximize the "coverage" of the ATPG
vectors. In other words, given some measure of the total number of nodes in the
chip that could be faulty (shorted, grounded, "stuck at 1",
"stuck at 0"), what percentage of them can be detected with the ATPG
vectors? Scan is a good technology and can achive high coverage in the 90%
range.
Scan testing does not solve all test problems. Scan testing typically does not
test memories (no flip-flops!), needs a gate-level netlist to work with, and
can take a long time to run on the ATE.
FPGA designers may be unfamiliar with scan since FPGA testing has already been
done by the FPGA manufacturer. ASIC designers do not have this luxury and must
handle all the manufacturing test details themselves.